AI Emerging Trends for 2024

BREAKING NEWS

AI's Next Leap: A Critical Eye on 2024's Emerging Trends

MIT Technology Review's latest forecast on artificial intelligence trends for 2024 is a mixed bag of predictable advancements and ambitious speculations.

Last year, they hit some marks: multimodal chatbots like OpenAI's GPT-4 and DeepMind's Gemini now work with text, images, and audio.

Tougher regulations emerged, with Biden's executive order and the EU's AI Act.

However, the anticipated open-source revolution against Big Tech's AI dominance hasn't quite materialized, and the AI-driven pharmaceutical transformation remains an unfolding story.

Now, the publication attempts to peer into AI's crystal ball once more, shunning the obvious to spotlight four specific trends:

1. Customized Chatbots: The democratization of chatbot creation is underway. Google and OpenAI are simplifying the process, allowing even non-coders to craft personalized AI tools. This could revolutionize user interactions across industries. Yet, the reliability of these models remains a question mark, plagued by biases and vulnerabilities.

2. Generative AI's Video Vanguard: After image generation, video is the next frontier. Startups like Runway are improving the quality of AI-generated videos, and even Hollywood is taking notice. But as the technology advances, so do concerns about deepfakes and their implications for copyright and authenticity.

3. AI-Generated Election Disinformation: Alarmingly, AI is becoming a tool for political manipulation. Deepfakes and AI-generated content are increasingly realistic, and the upcoming elections may witness unprecedented levels of digital deception. The fight against this tide of misinformation is critical but still in its infancy.

4. Multitasking Robots: Robotics is borrowing from AI's playbook, aiming for versatile machines capable of a broad spectrum of tasks. Data scarcity remains an obstacle, but innovative approaches to data collection and sharing are emerging. This could be a game-changer for industries reliant on automation.

While these predictions are insightful, they also raise red flags. The unchecked rise of customized chatbots and generative AI could exacerbate existing issues of misinformation and bias.

The AI industry must confront these challenges head-on, ensuring that the future of AI is not only innovative but responsible and secure.

As we brace for another year of rapid AI evolution, let's maintain a vigilant stance. We must ensure that the marvels of AI do not come at the cost of truth, ethics, and societal well-being. The clock is ticking, and the stakes are higher than ever.

OTHER NEWS

Generative AI: The New Factory of Digital Art or a Legal Minefield?

Andy Warhol's Factory churned out art that blurred the lines between originality and replication. Today, generative AI is sparking a similar debate, but with higher stakes.

A lawsuit against Midjourney and Stability AI has artists accusing these platforms of being modern-day Warhols, using AI to replicate their styles without consent or compensation.

Warhol, a master of appropriation, might have found the current uproar familiar.

His legacy includes not just iconic soup cans and celebrity portraits, but also a trail of copyright disputes. He once quipped, "Art is anything you can get away with." But can AI get away with the same?

The lawsuit's plaintiffs, including a concept artist and a cartoonist, argue that generative AI isn't innovating but copying. They claim Midjourney's database, which allegedly includes 20,000 artist names and styles, is a "parasite" on the creative industry.

Midjourney's response remains unheard, but the implications are clear: this isn't just about art; it's about the future of creative rights in the AI era.

Legal experts are watching closely. Harvard's Rebecca Tushnet points out that while style isn't copyrighted, individual works are. The distinction is crucial.

Software features like a "Warholize" button have existed for years without issue. The difference with AI is scale and sophistication.

The case against Midjourney isn't isolated. Roy Lichtenstein and Shepard Fairey faced similar accusations of copying. Yet, their works are celebrated, and their legal battles have often ended in settlements or faded into obscurity.

Will AI face the same trajectory, or will it redefine the boundaries of fair use and copyright law?

Warhol's Factory was a hub of collaboration and mass production, questioning the role of the artist. Generative AI poses a similar question but on a digital scale.

As the lawsuit unfolds, it's not just the fate of a few tech companies at stake, but the very nature of creativity and ownership in the digital age.

In a world where AI can replicate any style, what becomes of the artist? And as we grapple with these questions, we must also ask: What would Warhol say?

Perhaps he foresaw this when he predicted a future where everyone would be famous for 15 minutes. In the age of AI, maybe everyone's style will be replicated for 15 seconds.

Stay tuned as we navigate the intersection of technology, law, and art. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for the future of AI-generated content and the protection of creative expression.

SOCIAL MEDIA

Using descriptive prompts in MidJourney V6

AI IMAGE OF THE DAY

Using MidJourney For Patch Designs

FEEDBACK LOOP

LIKE IT, SHARE IT