AI Update: Nightshade New Copyright Deterrent, AI's Impact On Artists, ChatGPT For Thumbnail Ideas

BREAKING NEWS

Nightshade: The Artist's Revenge Against Generative AI

A new tool empowers artists to fight back against AI companies that use their work without permission.

In artificial intelligence, the line between creativity and infringement is becoming increasingly blurred. AI companies are facing a wave of lawsuits from artists claiming their work has been scraped without consent or compensation. But now, artists have a powerful new tool in their arsenal: Nightshade. This data poisoning tool allows artists to add invisible changes to their art, causing chaos and unpredictability in AI models that use their work without permission.

The Power Balance Shifts:
Nightshade, developed by a team led by Ben Zhao at the University of Chicago, aims to tip the power balance back toward artists. By "poisoning" the training data used by AI models, Nightshade can render their outputs useless or distorted. Dogs become cats, cars become cows, and the once-reliable AI models become unreliable. This tool is a direct response to AI companies that scrape artists' work without permission, such as OpenAI, Meta, Google, and Stability AI.

A Deterrent Against Copyright Infringement:
The hope is that Nightshade will act as a powerful deterrent against disrespecting artists' copyright and intellectual property. By making it clear that using artists' work without permission can lead to broken AI models, artists may regain control over their creations. However, the AI companies' response remains unknown, as they did not respond to MIT Technology Review's request for comment.

Combining Forces: Nightshade and Glaze:
Nightshade is not the only tool in the artist's arsenal. Zhao's team has also developed Glaze, a tool that allows artists to "mask" their personal style to prevent it from being scraped by AI companies. By subtly manipulating the pixels of their images, artists can prevent AI models from interpreting their work accurately. The team plans to integrate Nightshade into Glaze, giving artists the option to use both tools to protect their work.

The Potential for Abuse:
While Nightshade empowers artists, there is a risk that it could be abused for malicious purposes. However, the scale of the attack required to cause significant damage to larger AI models is substantial, as they are trained on billions of data samples. Nonetheless, the need for robust defenses against data poisoning attacks is becoming increasingly urgent.

Changing the Status Quo:
Nightshade has the potential to reshape the relationship between artists and AI companies. Artists like Eva Toorenent and Autumn Beverly see Nightshade as a way to regain power and control over their work. By making AI companies think twice about using artists' work without permission, Nightshade could pave the way for a more equitable future.

Nightshade represents a turning point in the battle between artists and AI companies. With this new tool, artists have the ability to fight back against copyright infringement and reclaim control over their creations. As the power balance shifts, it remains to be seen how AI companies will respond and whether they will start respecting artists' rights more seriously. In the meantime, Nightshade serves as a powerful reminder that artists are not powerless in the face of AI's encroachment on their work.

OTHER NEWS

The Dark Side of AI: How Generative AI is Threatening Artists' Livelihoods

In the age of artificial intelligence, technology continues to shape and transform various industries, and the art world is no exception. While AI has the potential to revolutionize creative workflows and enhance artistic expression, it also poses significant ethical challenges. In this article, we delve into the impact of generative AI on artists' lives, exploring the concerns raised by illustrator Kelly McKernan and the broader implications for the art community.

The Violation of Artists' Work:
Kelly McKernan, a successful fantasy artist with an impressive client list, including Dark Horse Comics and Stranger Things, has experienced the dark side of AI art firsthand. McKernan's art has been scraped into AI models without her consent, leaving her feeling violated and uncertain about the future of her career. She is not alone in this experience, as many artists have found their work used to train AI models without proper credit or compensation.

The Unethical Use of Generative AI:
While some argue that AI is just another tool in the creative process, McKernan highlights the ethical concerns surrounding the use of generative AI in art. She emphasizes that the implementation of AI art has been far from ethical, with massive data sets collected from the internet without artists' consent.

Companies have exploited these data sets for profit, often leaving artists unpaid and uncredited. McKernan is currently involved in a lawsuit against one such company, Midjourney, which used artists' names as file names in their AI program without permission.

The Lack of Transparency and Credit:
One of the significant issues with AI art is the lack of transparency and proper credit. Many artists are unaware that their work has been included in AI data sets, making it impossible for them to opt-out.

This lack of control over their own creations can have severe economic consequences for artists, as their names are not associated with AI-generated works, and their search results on platforms like Google can be overwritten by metadata from AI-generated images.

The Economic Impact on Artists:
The economic impact of AI-generated art is a growing concern for artists. McKernan shares her own experience of seeing her income drop significantly, potentially due to AI-generated art replacing commissioned work.

This has led her to return to teaching, not only as a financial necessity but also as a way to support emerging artists who are also grappling with the threat of AI.

The Fight for Ethical AI:
McKernan and other artists are calling on companies to adopt more ethical approaches to AI art. They argue that artists should have the right to license their work and receive proper compensation and credit if it is used by generative AI.

The current lack of regulation and the rush to exploit legal loopholes are driving unethical practices in the AI art space. Artists are fighting for their rights and striving to ensure that the future of art remains in the hands of those who create it, rather than those who exploit it for profit.

The rise of generative AI in the art world presents both opportunities and challenges. While AI has the potential to enhance creativity and streamline workflows, its unethical implementation threatens artists' livelihoods and creative control.

As the art community continues to grapple with the implications of AI, it is crucial for companies and regulators to address these concerns and establish ethical guidelines for the use of AI in art. Only then can artists like Kelly McKernan and countless others reclaim their rights and ensure the longevity of their careers in the face of technological advancements.

SOCIAL MEDIA

A great example of using ChatGPT 4’s image analysis to improve your YouTube channel.

AI IMAGE OF THE DAY

More Dalle 3 example images. Today it’s a Pomapoo like our Loki.

FEEDBACK LOOP

LIKE IT, SHARE IT